OpenLayers vs uMap

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOpenLayersuMap
CategoryMaps & GISMaps & GIS
LicenseBSD-2-ClauseAGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentsource, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 12,532★ 1,576
First released20062013
ReplacesGoogle Maps JavaScript APIGoogle My Maps

Why pick each one

Choose OpenLayers if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • Mature project with 12.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
OpenLayers details

Choose uMap if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
uMap details

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenLayers or uMap better?

Neither is universally better. OpenLayers has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are OpenLayers and uMap free and open-source?

Yes. OpenLayers is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and uMap under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OpenLayers and uMap with Docker?

OpenLayers: check the project docs for container support. uMap: yes.

Related comparisons