OpenLayers vs Idunn
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OpenLayers
High-performance library for all kinds of web maps
VS
Idunn
Geocoding and place API for self-hosted map frontends
| Feature | OpenLayers | Idunn |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | source, bare-metal | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 12,532 | ★ 38 |
| First released | 2006 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Google Maps JavaScript API | Google Places API, Foursquare Places |
Why pick each one
Choose OpenLayers if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- Mature project with 12.5k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Idunn if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenLayers or Idunn better?
OpenLayers is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Idunn if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are OpenLayers and Idunn free and open-source?
Yes. OpenLayers is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and Idunn under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenLayers and Idunn with Docker?
OpenLayers: check the project docs for container support. Idunn: yes.