OpenLayers vs OpenTripPlanner

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOpenLayersOpenTripPlanner
CategoryMaps & GISMaps & GIS
LicenseBSD-2-ClauseLGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptJava
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM256 MB8,192 MB
Deploymentsource, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 12,532★ 2,709
First released20062009
ReplacesGoogle Maps JavaScript APIGoogle Maps Transit

Why pick each one

Choose OpenLayers if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • Mature project with 12.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
OpenLayers details

Choose OpenTripPlanner if…

  • Released under the LGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.7k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Java
OpenTripPlanner details

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenLayers or OpenTripPlanner better?

OpenLayers is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider OpenTripPlanner if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are OpenLayers and OpenTripPlanner free and open-source?

Yes. OpenLayers is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and OpenTripPlanner under LGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OpenLayers and OpenTripPlanner with Docker?

OpenLayers: check the project docs for container support. OpenTripPlanner: yes.

Related comparisons