OpenGrok vs Sourcebot

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOpenGrokSourcebot
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitGit Hosting & Forges
LicenseCDDL-1.0MIT
LanguageJavaTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM2,048 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 4,902★ 3,659
First released20052024
ReplacesGitHub Code SearchGitHub Code Search, Sourcegraph

Why pick each one

Choose OpenGrok if…

  • Released under the CDDL-1.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Java
OpenGrok details

Choose Sourcebot if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.7k GitHub stars)
Sourcebot details

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenGrok or Sourcebot better?

Neither is universally better. OpenGrok has the larger community, while Sourcebot is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are OpenGrok and Sourcebot free and open-source?

Yes. OpenGrok is licensed under CDDL-1.0 and Sourcebot under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OpenGrok and Sourcebot with Docker?

OpenGrok: yes. Sourcebot: yes.

Related comparisons