OpenCode vs Wyoming faster-whisper
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted self-hosted ai options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OpenCode
The open source AI coding agent
VS
Wyoming faster-whisper
Speech-to-text service for the Wyoming voice protocol
| Feature | OpenCode | Wyoming faster-whisper |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Self-Hosted AI | Self-Hosted AI |
| License | free | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, one-click | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 194,821 | ★ 361 |
| First released | 2022 | 2023 |
| Replaces | — | Google Speech-to-Text |
Why pick each one
Choose OpenCode if…
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Mature project with 194.8k GitHub stars
Choose Wyoming faster-whisper if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenCode or Wyoming faster-whisper better?
Neither is universally better. OpenCode has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are OpenCode and Wyoming faster-whisper free and open-source?
Yes. OpenCode is licensed under free and Wyoming faster-whisper under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenCode and Wyoming faster-whisper with Docker?
OpenCode: yes. Wyoming faster-whisper: yes.