OpenCode vs whisper.cpp
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted self-hosted ai options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OpenCode
The open source AI coding agent
VS
whisper.cpp
Fast C++ port of OpenAI Whisper speech recognition
| Feature | OpenCode | whisper.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Self-Hosted AI | Self-Hosted AI |
| License | free | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, one-click | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 194,821 | ★ 52,677 |
| First released | 2022 | 2022 |
| Replaces | — | Otter.ai, Google Speech-to-Text |
Why pick each one
Choose OpenCode if…
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Mature project with 194.8k GitHub stars
Choose whisper.cpp if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 52.7k GitHub stars
- Written in C++
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenCode or whisper.cpp better?
OpenCode is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider whisper.cpp if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are OpenCode and whisper.cpp free and open-source?
Yes. OpenCode is licensed under free and whisper.cpp under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenCode and whisper.cpp with Docker?
OpenCode: yes. whisper.cpp: check the project docs for container support.