OpenClaw vs SWE-agent
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted self-hosted ai options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OpenClaw
The AI that actually does things
VS
SWE-agent
Language-model agent that resolves GitHub issues
| Feature | OpenClaw | SWE-agent |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Self-Hosted AI | Self-Hosted AI |
| License | free | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, one-click | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 385,509 | ★ 20,018 |
| First released | 2022 | 2024 |
| Replaces | — | Devin |
Why pick each one
Choose OpenClaw if…
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Mature project with 385.5k GitHub stars
Choose SWE-agent if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 20k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenClaw or SWE-agent better?
OpenClaw is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider SWE-agent if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are OpenClaw and SWE-agent free and open-source?
Yes. OpenClaw is licensed under free and SWE-agent under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenClaw and SWE-agent with Docker?
OpenClaw: yes. SWE-agent: yes.