SHSelfHostIndex

Audiobookshelf-tools vs Ryot

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
AU Audiobookshelf-tools Self-hosted e-book and library management server VS RY Ryot Self-hosted tracker for movies, shows, books, games, and more
FeatureAudiobookshelf-toolsRyot
CategoryE-books & Media LibraryMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageJavaTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, source
GitHub stars★ 760★ 3,518
First released20242023
ReplacesKindle, GoodreadsTrakt, Goodreads

Why pick each one

Choose Audiobookshelf-tools if…

  • Tidy library management
  • Web reader included
  • Active development
Audiobookshelf-tools details

Choose Ryot if…

  • Very broad tracking
  • Active development
Ryot details

Frequently asked questions

Is Audiobookshelf-tools or Ryot better?

Neither is universally better. Ryot has the larger community, while Audiobookshelf-tools is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Audiobookshelf-tools and Ryot free and open-source?

Yes. Audiobookshelf-tools is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Ryot under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Audiobookshelf-tools and Ryot with Docker?

Audiobookshelf-tools: yes. Ryot: yes.

Related comparisons