Open NotebookLM vs RAGFlow

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted self-hosted ai options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOpen NotebookLMRAGFlow
CategorySelf-Hosted AISelf-Hosted AI
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB8,192 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcedocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 36,464★ 87,057
First released20242024
ReplacesGoogle NotebookLMNotebookLM

Why pick each one

Choose Open NotebookLM if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 36.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Open NotebookLM details

Choose RAGFlow if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 87.1k GitHub stars
RAGFlow details

Frequently asked questions

Is Open NotebookLM or RAGFlow better?

Neither is universally better. RAGFlow has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Open NotebookLM and RAGFlow free and open-source?

Yes. Open NotebookLM is licensed under MIT and RAGFlow under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Open NotebookLM and RAGFlow with Docker?

Open NotebookLM: yes. RAGFlow: yes.

Related comparisons