SHSelfHostIndex

deck.gl vs TRIP

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
DE deck.gl WebGL-powered framework for large-scale data visualization on maps VS TR TRIP Minimalist POI Map tracker and Trip planner
Featuredeck.glTRIP
CategoryMaps & GISMaps & GIS
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentsourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 14,360★ 1,799
First released20162026
ReplacesMapbox visualization, ArcGIS—

Why pick each one

Choose deck.gl if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Mature project with 14.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
deck.gl details

Choose TRIP if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
TRIP details

Frequently asked questions

Is deck.gl or TRIP better?

Neither is universally better. deck.gl has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are deck.gl and TRIP free and open-source?

Yes. deck.gl is licensed under MIT and TRIP under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run deck.gl and TRIP with Docker?

deck.gl: check the project docs for container support. TRIP: yes.

Related comparisons