deck.gl vs Tangram
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
deck.gl
WebGL-powered framework for large-scale data visualization on maps
VS
Tangram
Flexible WebGL map rendering engine
| Feature | deck.gl | Tangram |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | source | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,360 | ★ 2,335 |
| First released | 2016 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Mapbox visualization, ArcGIS | Mapbox GL JS, Google Maps |
Why pick each one
Choose deck.gl if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 14.4k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Tangram if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Active community (2.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is deck.gl or Tangram better?
Neither is universally better. deck.gl has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are deck.gl and Tangram free and open-source?
Yes. deck.gl is licensed under MIT and Tangram under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run deck.gl and Tangram with Docker?
deck.gl: check the project docs for container support. Tangram: check the project docs for container support.