deck.gl vs Idunn
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
deck.gl
WebGL-powered framework for large-scale data visualization on maps
VS
Idunn
Geocoding and place API for self-hosted map frontends
| Feature | deck.gl | Idunn |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,360 | ★ 38 |
| First released | 2016 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Mapbox visualization, ArcGIS | Google Places API, Foursquare Places |
Why pick each one
Choose deck.gl if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 14.4k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Idunn if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is deck.gl or Idunn better?
deck.gl is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Idunn if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are deck.gl and Idunn free and open-source?
Yes. deck.gl is licensed under MIT and Idunn under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run deck.gl and Idunn with Docker?
deck.gl: check the project docs for container support. Idunn: yes.