deck.gl vs OpenLayers

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featuredeck.glOpenLayers
CategoryMaps & GISMaps & GIS
LicenseMITBSD-2-Clause
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentsourcesource, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 14,360★ 12,532
First released20162006
ReplacesMapbox visualization, ArcGISGoogle Maps JavaScript API

Why pick each one

Choose deck.gl if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Mature project with 14.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
deck.gl details

Choose OpenLayers if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • Mature project with 12.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
OpenLayers details

Frequently asked questions

Is deck.gl or OpenLayers better?

Neither is universally better. deck.gl has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are deck.gl and OpenLayers free and open-source?

Yes. deck.gl is licensed under MIT and OpenLayers under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run deck.gl and OpenLayers with Docker?

deck.gl: check the project docs for container support. OpenLayers: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons