Self-hosted LiveSync vs Wiki.js

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted notes & knowledge base options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSelf-hosted LiveSyncWiki.js
CategoryNotes & Knowledge BaseNotes & Knowledge Base
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptVue
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 11,908★ 28,727
First released20212017
ReplacesObsidian SyncConfluence, Notion

Why pick each one

Choose Self-hosted LiveSync if…

  • Free alternative to Obsidian Sync
  • Encrypted by default
Self-hosted LiveSync details

Choose Wiki.js if…

  • Flexible and full-featured
  • Many auth options
  • Good content management
Wiki.js details

Frequently asked questions

Is Self-hosted LiveSync or Wiki.js better?

Neither is universally better. Wiki.js has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Self-hosted LiveSync and Wiki.js free and open-source?

Yes. Self-hosted LiveSync is licensed under MIT and Wiki.js under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Self-hosted LiveSync and Wiki.js with Docker?

Self-hosted LiveSync: yes. Wiki.js: yes.

Related comparisons