NymphCast vs qBittorrent

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNymphCastqBittorrent
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseGPL-3.0-or-later
LanguageCC++
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB50 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 2,558★ 39,327
First released20242023
ReplacesµTorrent

Why pick each one

Choose NymphCast if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
NymphCast details

Choose qBittorrent if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
qBittorrent details

Frequently asked questions

Is NymphCast or qBittorrent better?

qBittorrent is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider NymphCast if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are NymphCast and qBittorrent free and open-source?

Yes. NymphCast is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and qBittorrent under GPL-3.0-or-later. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run NymphCast and qBittorrent with Docker?

NymphCast: check the project docs for container support. qBittorrent: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons