NymphCast vs PeerTube

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNymphCastPeerTube
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseAGPL-3.0
LanguageCTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 2,558★ 15,236
First released20242018
ReplacesYouTube, Vimeo

Why pick each one

Choose NymphCast if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
NymphCast details

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Frequently asked questions

Is NymphCast or PeerTube better?

Neither is universally better. PeerTube has the larger community, while NymphCast is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are NymphCast and PeerTube free and open-source?

Yes. NymphCast is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and PeerTube under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run NymphCast and PeerTube with Docker?

NymphCast: check the project docs for container support. PeerTube: yes.

Related comparisons