ntfy vs Zigbee2MQTT

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturentfyZigbee2MQTT
CategoryHome AutomationHome Automation
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 33,263★ 15,477
First released20212018
ReplacesPushover, PushbulletSmartThings

Why pick each one

Choose ntfy if…

  • Extremely easy to use
  • Cross-platform apps
ntfy details

Choose Zigbee2MQTT if…

  • Frees devices from vendor hubs
  • Wide device support
  • Local control
Zigbee2MQTT details

Frequently asked questions

Is ntfy or Zigbee2MQTT better?

ntfy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Zigbee2MQTT if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are ntfy and Zigbee2MQTT free and open-source?

Yes. ntfy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Zigbee2MQTT under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ntfy and Zigbee2MQTT with Docker?

ntfy: yes. Zigbee2MQTT: yes.

Related comparisons