Notesnook Sync Server vs TriliumNext Notes

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted notes & knowledge base options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNotesnook Sync ServerTriliumNext Notes
CategoryNotes & Knowledge BaseNotes & Knowledge Base
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageC#TypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 905★ 37,298
First released20232026
ReplacesEvernote, OneNote

Why pick each one

Choose Notesnook Sync Server if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in C#
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Notesnook Sync Server details

Choose TriliumNext Notes if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 37.3k GitHub stars
TriliumNext Notes details

Frequently asked questions

Is Notesnook Sync Server or TriliumNext Notes better?

Neither is universally better. TriliumNext Notes has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Notesnook Sync Server and TriliumNext Notes free and open-source?

Yes. Notesnook Sync Server is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and TriliumNext Notes under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Notesnook Sync Server and TriliumNext Notes with Docker?

Notesnook Sync Server: yes. TriliumNext Notes: yes.

Related comparisons