NocoDB vs Smocker

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNocoDBSmocker
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM1,024 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 64,441★ 1,284
First released20212019
ReplacesAirtableWireMock, Mockoon

Why pick each one

Choose NocoDB if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
NocoDB details

Choose Smocker if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
Smocker details

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or Smocker better?

Neither is universally better. NocoDB has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are NocoDB and Smocker free and open-source?

Yes. NocoDB is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Smocker under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run NocoDB and Smocker with Docker?

NocoDB: yes. Smocker: yes.

Related comparisons