Nitter vs Snikket
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Nitter
Alternative front-end for Twitter that respects your privacy
VS
Snikket
Easy self-hosted XMPP chat for groups
| Feature | Nitter | Snikket |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Social Networks |
| License | AGPL-3.0-only | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Nim | Lua |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,408 | ★ 437 |
| First released | 2023 | 2020 |
| Replaces | X | WhatsApp, Signal |
Why pick each one
Choose Nitter if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-only license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 13.4k GitHub stars
- Written in Nim
Frequently asked questions
Is Nitter or Snikket better?
Neither is universally better. Nitter has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Nitter and Snikket free and open-source?
Yes. Nitter is licensed under AGPL-3.0-only and Snikket under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Nitter and Snikket with Docker?
Nitter: check the project docs for container support. Snikket: yes.