Nitter vs pump.io
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Nitter
Alternative front-end for Twitter that respects your privacy
VS
pump.io
Streams server for the social web
| Feature | Nitter | pump.io |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Social Networks |
| License | AGPL-3.0-only | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Nim | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,408 | ★ 2,239 |
| First released | 2023 | 2013 |
| Replaces | X |
Why pick each one
Choose Nitter if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-only license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 13.4k GitHub stars
- Written in Nim
Choose pump.io if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Nitter or pump.io better?
Nitter is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider pump.io if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Nitter and pump.io free and open-source?
Yes. Nitter is licensed under AGPL-3.0-only and pump.io under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Nitter and pump.io with Docker?
Nitter: check the project docs for container support. pump.io: check the project docs for container support.