Nitter vs Phanpy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Nitter
Alternative front-end for Twitter that respects your privacy
VS
Phanpy
Minimalistic opinionated Fediverse ⁂ web client
| Feature | Nitter | Phanpy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Social Networks |
| License | AGPL-3.0-only | MIT |
| Language | Nim | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 100 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,408 | ★ 1,472 |
| First released | 2023 | 2024 |
| Replaces | X | Bluesky, Mastodon, Threads |
Why pick each one
Choose Nitter if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-only license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 13.4k GitHub stars
- Written in Nim
Choose Phanpy if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Nitter or Phanpy better?
Neither is universally better. Nitter has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Nitter and Phanpy free and open-source?
Yes. Nitter is licensed under AGPL-3.0-only and Phanpy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Nitter and Phanpy with Docker?
Nitter: check the project docs for container support. Phanpy: check the project docs for container support.