Horde Kronolith vs ETAR
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted calendar & contacts options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Horde Kronolith
Calendar application from the Horde groupware suite
VS
ETAR
Open-source calendar server companion for events
| Feature | Horde Kronolith | ETAR |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Calendar & Contacts | Calendar & Contacts |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10 | ★ 2,565 |
| First released | 2003 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Google Calendar, Exchange | Google Calendar |
Why pick each one
Choose Horde Kronolith if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Horde Kronolith or ETAR better?
ETAR is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Horde Kronolith if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Horde Kronolith and ETAR free and open-source?
Yes. Horde Kronolith is licensed under GPL-2.0 and ETAR under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Horde Kronolith and ETAR with Docker?
Horde Kronolith: check the project docs for container support. ETAR: yes.