Stringer vs Winds
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Stringer
Anti-social, self-hosted RSS reader
VS
Winds
Beautiful open-source RSS and podcast application
| Feature | Stringer | Winds |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,122 | ★ 9,115 |
| First released | 2013 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Google Reader | Feedly |
Why pick each one
Choose Winds if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 9.1k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Stringer or Winds better?
Neither is universally better. Winds has the larger community, while Stringer is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Stringer and Winds free and open-source?
Yes. Stringer is licensed under MIT and Winds under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Stringer and Winds with Docker?
Stringer: yes. Winds: yes.