Netron vs TelemetryDeck Self-Hosted

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNetronTelemetryDeck Self-Hosted
CategoryWeb AnalyticsWeb Analytics
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageJavaScriptSwift
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 33,323★ 225
First released20262021
ReplacesFirebase Analytics

Why pick each one

Choose Netron if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Mature project with 33.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Netron details

Choose TelemetryDeck Self-Hosted if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Swift
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
TelemetryDeck Self-Hosted details

Frequently asked questions

Is Netron or TelemetryDeck Self-Hosted better?

Neither is universally better. Netron has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Netron and TelemetryDeck Self-Hosted free and open-source?

Yes. Netron is licensed under MIT and TelemetryDeck Self-Hosted under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Netron and TelemetryDeck Self-Hosted with Docker?

Netron: check the project docs for container support. TelemetryDeck Self-Hosted: yes.

Related comparisons