Netron vs OpenReplay
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Netron
Visualizer for neural network and machine learning models
VS
OpenReplay
Self-hosted session replay and product analytics
| Feature | Netron | OpenReplay |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 33,323 | ★ 12,458 |
| First released | 2026 | 2021 |
| Replaces | — | FullStory, LogRocket |
Why pick each one
Choose Netron if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 33.3k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Netron or OpenReplay better?
Netron is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider OpenReplay if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Netron and OpenReplay free and open-source?
Yes. Netron is licensed under MIT and OpenReplay under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Netron and OpenReplay with Docker?
Netron: check the project docs for container support. OpenReplay: yes.