Netdata vs Uptime Kuma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNetdataUptime Kuma
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, kubernetesdocker
GitHub stars★ 80,075★ 89,960
First released20132021
ReplacesDatadog, New RelicPingdom, UptimeRobot

Why pick each one

Choose Netdata if…

  • Instant insight out of the box
  • Beautiful real-time charts
  • Easy install
Netdata details

Choose Uptime Kuma if…

  • Very easy to use
  • Great notifications
  • Lightweight
Uptime Kuma details

Frequently asked questions

Is Netdata or Uptime Kuma better?

Neither is universally better. Uptime Kuma has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Netdata and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?

Yes. Netdata is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Netdata and Uptime Kuma with Docker?

Netdata: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.

Related comparisons