Netdata vs ntopng

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNetdatantopng
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoLua
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, kubernetesdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 80,075★ 8,069
First released20132013
ReplacesDatadog, New RelicSolarWinds NetFlow

Why pick each one

Choose Netdata if…

  • Instant insight out of the box
  • Beautiful real-time charts
  • Easy install
Netdata details

Choose ntopng if…

  • Deep network visibility
  • Fast packet processing
ntopng details

Frequently asked questions

Is Netdata or ntopng better?

Netdata is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider ntopng if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Netdata and ntopng free and open-source?

Yes. Netdata is licensed under GPL-3.0 and ntopng under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Netdata and ntopng with Docker?

Netdata: yes. ntopng: yes.

Related comparisons