Nephele vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNepheleSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binary, sourcedocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 108★ 33,952
First released20222015
ReplacesownCloud, BoxAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Nephele if…

  • Flexible adapter system
  • Lightweight Node.js stack
Nephele details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Nephele or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Nephele is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Nephele and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Nephele is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Nephele and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Nephele: check the project docs for container support. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons