CameraView vs RPi Cam Web Interface
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CameraView
Android library for camera capture and streaming apps
VS
RPi Cam Web Interface
Web-based control and streaming for the Raspberry Pi camera
| Feature | CameraView | RPi Cam Web Interface |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Java | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,128 | ★ 1,599 |
| First released | 2016 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Proprietary camera SDKs | Nest Cam |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is CameraView or RPi Cam Web Interface better?
Neither is universally better. CameraView has the larger community, while RPi Cam Web Interface is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are CameraView and RPi Cam Web Interface free and open-source?
Yes. CameraView is licensed under MIT and RPi Cam Web Interface under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CameraView and RPi Cam Web Interface with Docker?
CameraView: check the project docs for container support. RPi Cam Web Interface: check the project docs for container support.