nano-graphrag vs OpenHands
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted self-hosted ai options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
nano-graphrag
Simple, hackable GraphRAG implementation in Python
VS
OpenHands
Autonomous AI software engineering agent
| Feature | nano-graphrag | OpenHands |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Self-Hosted AI | Self-Hosted AI |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,962 | ★ 83,415 |
| First released | 2024 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Microsoft GraphRAG | Devin, GitHub Copilot Workspace |
Why pick each one
Choose nano-graphrag if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Active community (4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Choose OpenHands if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 83.4k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is nano-graphrag or OpenHands better?
Neither is universally better. OpenHands has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are nano-graphrag and OpenHands free and open-source?
Yes. nano-graphrag is licensed under MIT and OpenHands under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run nano-graphrag and OpenHands with Docker?
nano-graphrag: check the project docs for container support. OpenHands: yes.