Nakama vs Zero-K

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNakamaZero-K
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-2.0
LanguageGoLua
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybare-metal, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 13,121★ 820
First released20172010
ReplacesPlayFab, FirebaseSupreme Commander

Why pick each one

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Choose Zero-K if…

  • Deep strategy
  • Completely free
Zero-K details

Frequently asked questions

Is Nakama or Zero-K better?

Nakama is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Zero-K if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Nakama and Zero-K free and open-source?

Yes. Nakama is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Zero-K under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Nakama and Zero-K with Docker?

Nakama: yes. Zero-K: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons