Nakama vs EDOPro

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNakamaEDOPro
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoC
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybare-metal, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 13,121★ 378
First released20172019
ReplacesPlayFab, FirebaseYu-Gi-Oh Master Duel

Why pick each one

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Choose EDOPro if…

  • Fully free card game
  • Self-hostable matchmaking
EDOPro details

Frequently asked questions

Is Nakama or EDOPro better?

Neither is universally better. Nakama has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Nakama and EDOPro free and open-source?

Yes. Nakama is licensed under Apache-2.0 and EDOPro under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Nakama and EDOPro with Docker?

Nakama: yes. EDOPro: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons