Nakama vs Xonotic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNakamaXonotic
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoC
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybare-metal, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 13,121★ 700
First released20172011
ReplacesPlayFab, FirebaseQuake, Unreal Tournament

Why pick each one

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Choose Xonotic if…

  • Lightweight dedicated server
  • Completely free assets
Xonotic details

Frequently asked questions

Is Nakama or Xonotic better?

Neither is universally better. Nakama has the larger community, while Xonotic is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Nakama and Xonotic free and open-source?

Yes. Nakama is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Xonotic under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Nakama and Xonotic with Docker?

Nakama: yes. Xonotic: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons