Nakama vs Waterfall

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNakamaWaterfall
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoShell
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybare-metal, docker
GitHub stars★ 13,121★ 751
First released20172016
ReplacesPlayFab, FirebaseBungeeCord

Why pick each one

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Choose Waterfall if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Shell
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Waterfall details

Frequently asked questions

Is Nakama or Waterfall better?

Neither is universally better. Nakama has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Nakama and Waterfall free and open-source?

Yes. Nakama is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Waterfall under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Nakama and Waterfall with Docker?

Nakama: yes. Waterfall: yes.

Related comparisons