Nakama vs Trivabble

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNakamaTrivabble
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0-or-later
LanguageGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB50 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 13,121
First released20172025
ReplacesPlayFab, Firebase

Why pick each one

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Choose Trivabble if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Trivabble details

Frequently asked questions

Is Nakama or Trivabble better?

Neither is universally better. Nakama has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Nakama and Trivabble free and open-source?

Yes. Nakama is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Trivabble under AGPL-3.0-or-later. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Nakama and Trivabble with Docker?

Nakama: yes. Trivabble: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons