Nakama vs shapez.io

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNakamashapez.io
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 13,121★ 6,932
First released20172020
ReplacesPlayFab, FirebaseFactorio

Why pick each one

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Choose shapez.io if…

  • Self-host the browser game
  • Lightweight
shapez.io details

Frequently asked questions

Is Nakama or shapez.io better?

Neither is universally better. Nakama has the larger community, while shapez.io is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Nakama and shapez.io free and open-source?

Yes. Nakama is licensed under Apache-2.0 and shapez.io under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Nakama and shapez.io with Docker?

Nakama: yes. shapez.io: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons