Nakama vs PocketBase

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNakamaPocketBase
CategoryGame ServersSelf-Hosting Platforms (PaaS)
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybinary, docker, source
GitHub stars★ 13,121★ 60,550
First released20172022
ReplacesPlayFab, FirebaseFirebase

Why pick each one

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Choose PocketBase if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 60.5k GitHub stars
PocketBase details

Frequently asked questions

Is Nakama or PocketBase better?

PocketBase is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Nakama if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Nakama and PocketBase free and open-source?

Yes. Nakama is licensed under Apache-2.0 and PocketBase under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Nakama and PocketBase with Docker?

Nakama: yes. PocketBase: yes.

Related comparisons