Nakama vs piqueserver

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNakamapiqueserver
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 13,121★ 237
First released20172015
ReplacesPlayFab, FirebaseAce of Spades official server

Why pick each one

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Choose piqueserver if…

  • Highly extensible
  • Easy to script
piqueserver details

Frequently asked questions

Is Nakama or piqueserver better?

Neither is universally better. Nakama has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Nakama and piqueserver free and open-source?

Yes. Nakama is licensed under Apache-2.0 and piqueserver under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Nakama and piqueserver with Docker?

Nakama: yes. piqueserver: yes.

Related comparisons