Nakama vs OpenLoco

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNakamaOpenLoco
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoC++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybare-metal, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 13,121★ 1,844
First released20172018
ReplacesPlayFab, FirebaseChris Sawyer's Locomotion original

Why pick each one

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Choose OpenLoco if…

  • Revives a classic
  • Cross-platform
OpenLoco details

Frequently asked questions

Is Nakama or OpenLoco better?

Neither is universally better. Nakama has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Nakama and OpenLoco free and open-source?

Yes. Nakama is licensed under Apache-2.0 and OpenLoco under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Nakama and OpenLoco with Docker?

Nakama: yes. OpenLoco: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons