morss vs yarr
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
morss
Get full-text and complete RSS feeds from any source
VS
yarr
Yet another RSS reader as a single binary
| Feature | morss | yarr |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | binary, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 776 | ★ 3,919 |
| First released | 2013 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Feedly | Feedly, Google Reader |
Why pick each one
Choose morss if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is morss or yarr better?
yarr is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider morss if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are morss and yarr free and open-source?
Yes. morss is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and yarr under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run morss and yarr with Docker?
morss: yes. yarr: yes.