morss vs Winds
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
morss
Get full-text and complete RSS feeds from any source
VS
Winds
Beautiful open-source RSS and podcast application
| Feature | morss | Winds |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 776 | ★ 9,115 |
| First released | 2013 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Feedly | Feedly |
Why pick each one
Choose morss if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose Winds if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 9.1k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is morss or Winds better?
Neither is universally better. Winds has the larger community, while morss is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are morss and Winds free and open-source?
Yes. morss is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Winds under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run morss and Winds with Docker?
morss: yes. Winds: yes.