Moodist vs Transmission

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMoodistTransmission
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicensefreeGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptC++
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM512 MB50 MB
Deploymentdocker, one-clickbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 3,671★ 15,047
First released20232023
ReplacesµTorrent

Why pick each one

Choose Moodist if…

  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
  • Active community (3.7k GitHub stars)
Moodist details

Choose Transmission if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 15k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Transmission details

Frequently asked questions

Is Moodist or Transmission better?

Neither is universally better. Transmission has the larger community, while Moodist is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Moodist and Transmission free and open-source?

Yes. Moodist is licensed under free and Transmission under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Moodist and Transmission with Docker?

Moodist: yes. Transmission: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons