Moodist vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMoodistSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicensefreeMIT
LanguageTypeScriptC++
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, one-clickdocker
GitHub stars★ 3,671★ 29,105
First released20232025
Replaces

Why pick each one

Choose Moodist if…

  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
  • Active community (3.7k GitHub stars)
Moodist details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Moodist or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community, while Moodist is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Moodist and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. Moodist is licensed under free and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Moodist and SRS with Docker?

Moodist: yes. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons