MiniDLNA vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMiniDLNASRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-2.0MIT
LanguageCC++
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 200★ 29,105
First released20082025
ReplacesPlex

Why pick each one

Choose MiniDLNA if…

  • Tiny footprint
  • Runs on routers and NAS
MiniDLNA details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniDLNA or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community, while MiniDLNA is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are MiniDLNA and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. MiniDLNA is licensed under GPL-2.0 and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run MiniDLNA and SRS with Docker?

MiniDLNA: yes. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons