Slash vs Sink
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted url shorteners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Slash
Open-source, self-hosted bookmarks and link shortener
VS
Sink
Serverless URL shortener with built-in analytics
| Feature | Slash | Sink |
|---|---|---|
| Category | URL Shorteners | URL Shorteners |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Vue |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | source, one-click |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,169 | ★ 7,000 |
| First released | 2023 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Bitly, go links | Bitly |
Why pick each one
Choose Slash if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.2k GitHub stars)
Choose Sink if…
- Released under the MIT license
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Mature project with 7k GitHub stars
- Written in Vue
Frequently asked questions
Is Slash or Sink better?
Neither is universally better. Sink has the larger community, while Slash is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Slash and Sink free and open-source?
Yes. Slash is licensed under MIT and Sink under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Slash and Sink with Docker?
Slash: yes. Sink: check the project docs for container support.