Slash vs rs-short
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted url shorteners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Slash
Open-source, self-hosted bookmarks and link shortener
VS
rs-short
Lightweight link shortener written in Rust, with features such as
| Feature | Slash | rs-short |
|---|---|---|
| Category | URL Shorteners | URL Shorteners |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,169 | — |
| First released | 2023 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Bitly, go links | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Slash if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.2k GitHub stars)
Choose rs-short if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Written in Rust
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Slash or rs-short better?
Slash is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider rs-short if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Slash and rs-short free and open-source?
Yes. Slash is licensed under MIT and rs-short under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Slash and rs-short with Docker?
Slash: yes. rs-short: check the project docs for container support.