Mineflayer vs OpenRCT2

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMineflayerOpenRCT2
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptC++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentsourcebare-metal, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 7,312★ 16,049
First released20132014
Replacescommercial game bot frameworksRollerCoaster Tycoon

Why pick each one

Choose Mineflayer if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Mature project with 7.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Mineflayer details

Choose OpenRCT2 if…

  • Faithful modern remake
  • Active community
OpenRCT2 details

Frequently asked questions

Is Mineflayer or OpenRCT2 better?

Neither is universally better. OpenRCT2 has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Mineflayer and OpenRCT2 free and open-source?

Yes. Mineflayer is licensed under MIT and OpenRCT2 under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Mineflayer and OpenRCT2 with Docker?

Mineflayer: check the project docs for container support. OpenRCT2: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons