mc-router vs Unciv

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featuremc-routerUnciv
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseApache-2.0MPL-2.0
LanguageGoKotlin
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybare-metal, binary, docker
GitHub stars★ 883★ 11,071
First released20192018
ReplacesManual port mappingCivilization V

Why pick each one

Choose mc-router if…

  • Simplifies multi-server hosting
  • Very lightweight
mc-router details

Choose Unciv if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 11.1k GitHub stars
Unciv details

Frequently asked questions

Is mc-router or Unciv better?

Unciv is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider mc-router if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are mc-router and Unciv free and open-source?

Yes. mc-router is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Unciv under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run mc-router and Unciv with Docker?

mc-router: yes. Unciv: yes.

Related comparisons