midPoint vs Ory Hydra
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
midPoint
Open-source identity governance and administration platform
VS
Ory Hydra
Certified OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect server
| Feature | midPoint | Ory Hydra |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Java | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 521 | ★ 17,462 |
| First released | 2011 | 2015 |
| Replaces | SailPoint, Saviynt | Okta, Auth0 |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is midPoint or Ory Hydra better?
Neither is universally better. Ory Hydra has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are midPoint and Ory Hydra free and open-source?
Yes. midPoint is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Ory Hydra under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run midPoint and Ory Hydra with Docker?
midPoint: yes. Ory Hydra: yes.